Saturday, November 27, 2010

Am I losing touch with reality

This is a serious question I am posing to my 2 blog readers has the whole world gone crazy or is it me who is crazy?  I am just a regressive ape-man who cannot understand the "gay" love between two vultures and the outrage at their separation.  Apparently in Germany the land of my ancestors and tolerance (that part was not meant  to be funny) two male vultures flying around the aviary decided that they much preferred the company of each other to the company of the female vultures.  Apparently these two male vultures even nest together and now it has been decided that they are gay.  How you decide that a vulture is gay is beyond me unless the vultures are getting down and even if these vultures are gay who cares right?  Apparently two sides in Germany the zookeepers and the gay rights activists no this is not a joke just completely hilarious.  First of all, is there really a need for gay rights activists to come out (no pun intended) and protest the separation of two gay vultures.  Secondly, why are these gay vultures being separated this is a non-issue people is there some vulture shortage that requires these two gay birds to reproduce if not then I say let them nest together and be gay vultures.  Also have gay rights activists achieved all of their desires and objectives such that they are now focused with laser precision on sexual equality for vultures.  I am done fighting for gay human rights and it is now time to fight for our gay animal friends.  Honestly, the world is going to hell and everyone is worried about homosexual vultures this is  truly the first sign of the impending apocalypse.  Germany lighten up let the gay vultures fly over rainbows of tolerance it is thanksgiving after all.

Tuesday, November 23, 2010

Predictable response

This could be one of the most serious international incidents facing the Obama administration if you do not count the last time North Korea launched an unprovoked attack on South Korea while the U.S. stood by slack-jawed looking weak and stupid.  When a North Korean submarine fired a torpedo sinking a South Korean vessel and killing dozens of South Korean sailors the U.S. predictably stated we support our ally in South Korea but did nothing to halt this aggressive and unwarranted behavior by the military dictatorship of North Korea and its evil midget ruler.  Apparently North Korea has attacked again launching missiles at a South Korean island which contains both service members and civilians and what does America do?  Once again we warn against further aggresive behavior this is like warning to take a child's ice cream cone if they continue to commit arson in their playroom.  America needs to be decisive and strong and send a message to the despotic midget ruler of North Korea we will crush you and your pathetic regime at will.  However, there remains one inconvenient truth China supports their North Korean puppet and China owns American through treasury bonds and other assets, loans etc due to America's love affair with deficiet spending for unfunded entitlements.  Thank you welfare and bridges to nowhere we are know beholden to the communists and why not I mean if our Chinese sugar daddy continues to feed the Federal Reserve's drug habit and the Federal Government's irresponsible spending why shouldn't we abandon an old ally to the talons of a midget dictator and his communist puppet masters.  I am no fan of war as a general rule but America is not adverse to military exercises in futility i.e. vietnam and afghanistan or the more popular proxy war Angola, Central America but our personal favorite beating up on the pathetic Grenada, Panama and Iraq.  Given our track record of fighting tinpot dictators and engaging in long protracted wars of attrition (see above). Why would America not jump at the chance to smash North Korea once and for all.  Oh yeah forgot about that unfunded entitlement spending it is a real killer(just ask the South Koreans) when you cannot pay your debts whether it Joe the Ragman or Uncle Sam.

Thursday, October 28, 2010

Muslims speaking out

A lot of people demand that Muslims speak out and that we participate in dialogue to further peace and understanding between the Islamic and Non-Islamic world.  To me this is confusing I do not differentiate between the Islamic and Non-Islamic world because I live in the only world I am aware and this world is not bisected or balkanized by religion.  Having said all of that a Saudi Royal Prince has spoken in favor of moving the misnamed "Ground Zero" mosque to another less offensive location.  There you go America as I said the location of the Mosque is irrelevant it is the fact that some people  in this country want to ban our freedom to practice our religion.  Move the Mosque and end this senseless debate!!

Monday, October 18, 2010

GPS Tracking: The demise of a free Nation

In times of confusion and strife tryants will arise among the people and attempt to steer the conversation into the arena of the absurd and the ridiculous.  I will be the first person to stand up and point out that Islamic extremists pose a grave threat to America's national security and that we must be vigilant about the threat that this terrorists pose to our safety and well-being.  However, I do not believe that in times of war the government is justified in sacrificing our basic civil liberties on the altar of expediency and knee-jerk reactions.  In case you did not know various law enforcement officers in America have begun conducting unwarranted gps placement and subsequent tracking of the movement of free citizens in America.  In particular it is my understand that SUPRISE! the American-Islamic community is being targeted with little to no evidence or provocation for the simple offense of belief in Islam.  What is scary about this process is that it invests law enforcement with the power to decide at will when and where to monitor the movements of American citizens who have never done anything wrong.  Imagine the wide open areas of abuse for such a carte blanche endorsement to run rampant over political enemies, underprivileged people and unpopular groups of people.  If law enforcement or the federal government feels that they have reasonable suspicion or probable cause to monitor the movements of someone within the continental U.S. there is a process for obtaining a legal search warrant.  People will no doubt scoff at this and say well this is merely a tool in fighting the global war on terrorism and crime.  Is it really?  Let's suppose that is does assist the federal government and local law enforcement in apprehending and preventing various types of crime including but not limited to terrorism that is not in and of itself a justification.  The problem with warrantless survilleance by GPS is that it invades the privacy of the person being watched without a legal justification or reason.

The case about unwarranted GPS monitoring recently re-ignited because while having an oil change performed it was discovered that a strange wire was coming from the gas tank of a Muslim-American of Arab descent.  The device was removed by the oil change service station and the FBI contacted the Service Station and demanded back their equipment.  No explanation was given for why this man never convicted of any crime and only working and living in America paying taxes and obeying the law was being monitored without a warrant.  No wait a reason was given this man was guilty of the heinous crime of having extensive contacts in the Middle East!  Definitely suspicious considering the man is from gasp! Egypt an American ally located in you guessed it the Middle East.  The real problem is that when the precedent is set that the government can do whatever it wants under the pathetic and overused guise of NATIONAL security the only thing that becomes more secure is the draconian grip of the government around the throat of free citizens.

Thursday, October 14, 2010

GOP and the O'Donnell Problem

As a Conservative Libertarian I tend to vote the GOP ticket but I am troubled by Christine O'Donnell and it has little to do with soft allegations about masterbation or witchcraft.  Honestly I do not care about such red herring issues and I focus like a laser on the issues that matter to me small efficient government, free markets and low taxes while still ensuring freedom and justice for all Americans.  The real problem with Christine O'Donnell she is not a very good candidate and she showed this lack of political chops in the first debate.  It would be much too easy to dismiss O'Donnell as stupid or as a right wing extremist I do not think this hyperbole properly captures O'Donnell the candidate.  What Chrisitine O'Donnell is an unremarkable and uninteresting bland average American of average intelligence neither good nor bad.  While the basic tenants of her CONSERVATIVE message sound really progressive and great for America in this time of economic despair and recession when held to the light of scrutiny the are exposed as airy false platitudes.  Candidates like O'Donnell have no idea how to win a fierce political election and they have no understanding or real game plan for getting America back on track.  Standing against Obama and the Liberal Democrats sounds great on paper but what does it really mean?  Also acting like statements about witchcraft, failing to maintain your personal finances and taking hardline stances on sexual issues will not matter in an election are simply naive.  O'Donnell almost seems oblivious that she could be attacked because she is after all the TEA party child of light and justice.  What is most telling about O'Donnell was her inability to name one single Supreme Court case in recent years that she objects to based on her political beliefs this from a chest beating fist pumping Social Conservative.  Republicans still have not gotten the message it is the economy stupid not masterbation or prayer in school that wins popular elections social conservatism wins GOP primaries but the wider public does not care about your values as much as they care about their families economic security.  America is made up of many different kinds of family a wide panorama of faiths, values and belief systems and this is lost on many social conservatives.  There are two family value that extends across all faith/ethnic groups and that is love and respect.  Christine O'Donnell may or may not be a nice person she maybe a conservative but she is not a great candidate and she looks clueless when held to the fire so how will she govern?